An.Inconvenient.Truth[2006]DVDrip[Eng]XviD[Multisubs]-i0
- Type:
- Video > Movies
- Files:
- 10
- Size:
- 1.37 GB
- Spoken language(s):
- English
- Texted language(s):
- English, French, Spanish
- Quality:
- +0 / -0 (0)
- Uploaded:
- Aug 27, 2008
- By:
- i0
An Inconvenient Truth (2006) 2CD version Video: 2pass xvid Audio: average 128kbit/s VBR mp3 Subtitles: English, Estonian, French, Spanish Happy leeching! i0
Work of science fiction pretending to be real.
Knaster at 2008-10-06 01:27 CET:
LOL oh let me guess you two guys are Americans?
There are some who still find it meaningful to challenge the major thesis or the film, namely that we are seriously contributing to global warming by filling the atmosphere with carbon dioxide.
How about visiting some of the biggest cities in the world, like Kolkata, any major Latin american city, China?
Gore's and Guggenheim's film is just a propaganda film, for something that really needs propaganda, for it has been oversighted for too long - a damn good one film, too.
The same judge that found some inaccuracies in the film, concluded that the major thesis of the film stands and that it is suitable for the in class, school education, if completed with more less dramatical and more scientific evidence. Look at this (and yes, I do make it possible to check my sources in full):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/11/AR2007101102134.html
High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.
How about visiting some of the biggest cities in the world, like Kolkata, any major Latin american city, China?
Gore's and Guggenheim's film is just a propaganda film, for something that really needs propaganda, for it has been oversighted for too long - a damn good one film, too.
The same judge that found some inaccuracies in the film, concluded that the major thesis of the film stands and that it is suitable for the in class, school education, if completed with more less dramatical and more scientific evidence. Look at this (and yes, I do make it possible to check my sources in full):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/11/AR2007101102134.html
High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.
Comments